Today's Paper News Sports Obits Events Classifieds Digital FAQ Newsletters Contact us

Hearing on bills banning foreign ownership of farm land draws crowd

by Allen Fennewald | March 14, 2018 at 4:27 a.m. | Updated March 14, 2018 at 12:05 p.m.
<p>Submitted photo</p><p>Jeff Jones, of Friends of Responsible Agriculture; Terry Spense, of the Socially Responsible Agriculture Project; and Tim Gibbons, of the Missouri Rural Crisis Center, hold the beginning pages of more than 3,000 signatures gathered in support of House Bills 2161 and 2206 at a public hearing Tuesday morning in the Missouri State Capitol.</p>

Three paper reels containing more than 3,000 signatures rolled across Missouri House Hearing Room 7, out the door and down the hallway Tuesday morning during a public hearing of the Economic Development Committee at the Capitol.

The signatures represented Missouri residents supporting House Bills 2161 and 2206, which would prohibit any alien or foreign businesses from acquiring agricultural land in the state. This would repeal a 2013 law allowing international companies to own as much as 1 percent (300,000 acres) of Missouri's agricultural land.

With the 1 percent limitation in place, Chinese company Shuanghui International Holdings Ltd. was able to purchase Smithfield Foods, which owns Premium Standard Farms in northern Missouri. The deal gave Chinese-sponsored business entities control of about 25 percent of the state's pork production.

Among the bills supporters' concerns with large-scale foreign ownership of Missouri farmland is that Chinese companies are less invested in maintaining the quality of the land for future generations than Missouri farmers. They also fear China's control of such a large portion of U.S. food production could be used to battle America in a trade war by manipulating commodity prices.

Representatives from the Missouri Farm Bureau, Missouri Rural Crisis Center, Friends of Responsible Agriculture, Family Farm Action and others testified Tuesday in favor of the bills.

Callaway County farmer Jeff Jones, a member of local group Friends of Responsible Agriculture, helped roll out the signatures at the public hearing.

"As a fourth-generation traditional family farmer it's really important that (the Legislature) understand foreign ownership puts great pressure on the traditional family farmer and agricultural communities," he said. "If they buy up our land, which is the goose that lays the golden egg, they could use our food supply as leverage against us. We as traditional family farmers raise food to help each other, and these foreign investors and corporations that buy up the land don't have the same morals and interests in caring for the land that we do."

Those who testified against the bills included representatives from Smithfield Foods, the Missouri Cattlemen's Association, Missouri Pork Producers and the Missouri Land Federation.

The Missouri Land Federation is concerned that under the bills' current language, any property sale larger than 5 acres that could be used for agricultural purposes will have to be submitted to the Department of Agriculture for approval.

Cattlemen's Association representative Mike Deering said the bills would be a slap in the face to long-valued free market principles, and the 2013 law closed loopholes formerly used by foreign entities to effectively purchase Missouri farmland with less state oversight.

Missouri Pork Association lobbyist Brent Hemphill said the bills could limit American exports to worldwide markets and the 1 percent maximum was sufficient to limit foreign control of Missouri agriculture.

Missouri Pork Association Executive Vice President Don Nikkodem said the association supports agricultural investment in rural communities, including that of companies like Smithfield Foods. He said after the hearing foreign ownership makes up only a fraction of the maximum 1 percent, and further limiting foreign investment in rural Missouri agriculture would jeopardize the well-paying jobs those companies provide.

State Rep. Alan Green, D-Florissant, questioned whether reducing the cap on foreign ownership would be enough to rectify the problems the bills' supporters listed, such as Chinese control in American business, because many additional industries have been largely bought into by foreign companies.

State Rep. Doug Beck, D-St. Louis, indicated protecting national security should be more important to the Legislature than promoting free markets.


Sponsor Content