Friday, November 19, 2010
JEFFERSON CITY - Gov. Jay Nixon today announced an agreement with key energy companies across the state to begin the process to construct a second nuclear power plant in Missouri, while protecting the interests of consumers.
The Governor made the announcement at the Governor's Mansion in Jefferson City, with community, labor and business leaders.
Gov. Nixon said he had reached a historic agreement with a consortium of Missouri electric utilities that have agreed to seek an early site permit to build a second, state-of-the-art nuclear facility at AmerenUE's Callaway County location. That agreement includes key protections for Missouri consumers.
"Residential and commercial ratepayers will not pay one penny unless the consortium is given the early site permit; the costs associated with seeking that permit are determined to be "prudent;" and the Missouri Public Service Commission approves them," Gov. Nixon said. "In addition, this agreement will keep consumer protections on the books for construction work in progress."
That represents a significant shift in strategy for utilities, and a significant victory for Missouri ratepayers, Gov. Nixon said.
In the coming weeks, Gov. Nixon will be working with Missouri lawmakers and members of the energy consortium to pursue legislation that will allow them to recover the costs of obtaining an early site permit. A bill will be introduced in the Missouri legislature by Senator-Elect Mike Kehoe, whose district encompasses five counties in central Missouri, including Callaway County.
To help maintain the state's energy independence and affordability, Missouri needs to be at the head of the line as the next generation of clean, affordable, safe nuclear facilities is engineered, permitted by the federal government, built and brought online, Gov. Nixon said.
"The sooner the process is started, the sooner our state will reap the rewards," he said.
Currently, there is one nuclear plant in Missouri, AmerenUE's Callaway plant near Fulton, which has been in operation since 1984. The construction of a second nuclear power plant would create thousands of new jobs and new business opportunities, and have a long-lasting impact on Missouri's economy.
Partners in the new energy consortium include: Ameren Missouri; Associated Electric Cooperative Inc.; Empire District Electric; the Association of Missouri Electric Cooperatives; Kansas City Power & Light; and the Missouri Public Utility Alliance.
Barry Hart, Executive Vice-president and CEO of the Association of Missouri Electric Cooperatives called the agreement "an important first step in creating an option to move forward on additional nuclear power."
"Faced with today's regulatory uncertainties, we must be pro-active in protecting reliability and costs for our consumer-members and preserving opportunities for future base load generation," Hart said. "We believe this legislation is good for the state of Missouri."
Warner L. Baxter, Chairman, CEO and President of AmerenUE said his company supports the Governor's call for legislation that will keep open the option of a second nuclear power plant for Missouri.
"Given the uncertainties regarding how best to replace aging power plants, the potential impact of anticipated EPA regulations, and continued consideration at the federal level of carbon tax proposals, Ameren Missouri believes strongly that our state must keep all options on the table - including additional nuclear power generation," Baxter said. "We commend Governor Nixon's leadership on this vital issue."
Missouri has traditionally enjoyed some of the most affordable energy power in the nation, and currently has the nation's seventh lowest energy costs among all 50 states. That has allowed it to attract and retain businesses with high energy demands, such as raw materials processing and automobile manufacturing.
Construction of a second nuclear plant would generate thousands of new, good-paying jobs from cutting-edge high-tech positions for engineers and scientists, to long-term construction jobs for construction trades including iron and sheet metal workers; cement masons and electricians; boilermakers, bricklayers and pipefitters.
"Every family needs reliable, affordable energy to heat and cool their homes," Gov. Nixon said. "And every business in every sector of our economy - whether it's a family farm in the Bootheel, a sawmill in the Ozarks, a hospital complex in St. Louis, or a community college in Springfield - needs reliable, affordable energy to grow and prosper."
"I am very pleased that the Governor is providing leadership to ensure energy security for Missouri into the future," said Jim Jura, President and CEO of Associated Electric Cooperative Inc., based in Springfield.
Bill Gipson, President and CEO of Empire District Electric said his company "welcomes the opportunity to work with other electric service providers from throughout the state to keep the option of nuclear energy available," for the people of Missouri.
Bill Downey, President of Kansas City Power & Light said the company believes that energy diversification is the best way to work to achieve energy independence and to keep electricity affordable for all consumers.
"We applaud Governor Nixon for working to ensure that all safe, reliable and efficient energy options are available to Missourians," Downey said.
Duncan Kincheloe, General Manager and CEO of Missouri Public Utility Alliance said
the Governor's call to keep nuclear energy as an option for Missouri's long-term power needs is exactly the direction needed for job growth and economic expansion.
"As consumer-owned non-profits, municipal utilities strongly support this opportunity to include nuclear power in our energy mix as an affordable, clean energy alternative," Kincheloe said. "The state's business and government leaders need to look beyond next quarter's stock returns and campaign sound bites if we're going to have affordable electricity in the next decade. Missouri's power plants are wearing out. If we don't support investment in Missouri's energy future now, we're strangling new jobs and growth."
Comments
ConcernedCitizen 2 years, 6 months ago
This makes me so angry. We fought and fought not to be charged to build their plant and Nixon says, "Residential and commercial ratepayers will not pay one penny unless the consortium is given the early site permit", except in the paragraph right before that he says he had reached a historic agreement with a consortium of Missouri electric utilities that have agreed to seek an early site permit.
I agree that Missouri needs to invest in our energy future, but nuclear power is not clean, safe, or affordable. The toxic waste will have to be guarded for tens of thousands of years if not hundreds of thousands and those costs and dangers are conveniently left out of any cost or risk a55essments (PS-Webmaster you need to fix your language filter). Moving away from oil and coal is great, but moving to another finite resource which is quickly being depleted like uranium is just making the same mistake again.
Missouri has significant wind and solar power available to be harnessed that could create huge numbers of new jobs and would not lay the toxic burden of our current energy use on our children and many many generations to come.
fultonian 2 years, 6 months ago
Actually, the cost of storing the used fuel (which isn't as "toxic" as you claim) is factored into the cost of the fuel when it's initially purchased so yes the cost is asessed. If it wasn't for Jimmy Carter we could take the used fuel and RE-refine it to be used again! recycling at its best! You also stated that "Missouri has significant wind and solar power available " Well no it doesn't. when is the last time the sun was out and shining enough to make any energy. Wind and Solar power plants are a parlor trick at best. The amount of energy it takes to make a solar panel or wind farm is barely recovered in the amount they produce. It appears you have catfish syndrome, all mouth and no brain! you need to get the facts before you shoot your mouth of about things you have no clue about.
ConcernedCitizen 2 years, 6 months ago
Actually, I make more power than I can use from my home solar/wind hybrid system. We're not located in the best location for either wind or solar, but we have significant amounts of both. And YES radioactive waste is toxic, or perhaps you'd like to store it in your yard. You are right though, they do include the costs for the first 100 years of monitoring the waste, unfortunately that's insignificant when you're talking about tens of thousands of years with some waste actually being dangerous up to a million years(I checked). Reprocessing is obviously a more efficient practice, but you end up purifying the uranium into weapons grade material which then has to be even more heavily protected for obvious reasons. If you disagree then we can have a discussion, but telling me that I don't have a brain or a clue is insulting and shows immaturity and bias on your part.
ConcernedCitizen 2 years, 6 months ago
Actually, I make more power than I can use from my home solar/wind hybrid system. We're not located in the best location for either wind or solar, but we have significant amounts of both. And YES radioactive waste is toxic, or perhaps you'd like to store it in your yard. You are right though, they do include the costs for the first 100 years of monitoring the waste, unfortunately that's insignificant when you're talking about tens of thousands of years with some waste actually being dangerous up to a million years(I checked). Reprocessing is obviously a more efficient practice, but you end up purifying the uranium into weapons grade material which then has to be even more heavily protected for obvious reasons. If you disagree then we can have a discussion, but telling me that I don't have a brain or a clue is insulting and shows immaturity and bias on your part.
JCLifer 2 years, 6 months ago
I thought it was only the republicans who gave huge corporate welfare deals to big corporations. Guess I was wrong- Demos do it too.
Regardless, I am all for expanding Nuclear Energy in this country, and now during the depression is the best time to do it. Interest rates are very low for financing, lots of cheap labor is available, and nuclear has proven to be a, efficient, safe, clean manner to produce the power we will need for electric cars and expanding technology.
captainredfish 2 years, 6 months ago
Fultonian- Thanks to Jimmy Carter we cannot use breeder reactors that reuse fuel.
malmark 2 years, 6 months ago
Fultonian - I have also considered purchasing a solar or hybrid solar/wind system for my house (since I need a new roof anyway) and I have calculated that one side of my roof 3/4 full of panels could generate enough electricity for my entire household year round, that is, in the times where there is overproduction it would spin my meter backwards if the city would allow it to contribute to the grid. The fact that there are not many system sin place in Missouri or across the central midwest is due to the fact that the systems have been more heavily marketed in places like California and Florida. They actually are developing new panels now that don't even need any visible light to generate power, they work off UV light that bounces around all day and night.
Sign in to comment
Or login with:
OpenID